Yexo wrote:

I can't get it to crash with MariCo v0.2 15.12.2010. What do you need to do exactly to get it to crash?

This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/4775#comment10365

mb wrote:

I can't get it to crash with MariCo v0.2 15.12.2010.

Well, it´s not with MariCo 0.2, but with 0.23 (under development).

This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/4775#comment10372

Yexo wrote:

Can you upload a minimal example so we can reproduce the crash? In case you don't want to make it public yet you can just email it.

This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/4775#comment10375

mb wrote:

I have removed lots of code, yet it´s still not a "minimal example". Try to build "quays" on coast tiles.

Attachments

• newobj.grf (167.38 KiB)
• crash.sav (82.09 KiB)

This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/4775#comment10428

Yexo wrote:

Thanks for that.

The crash is an assert in DoCommandPInternal, the result from the test and exec run are different. The test run succeeds while the exec run fails due to the tile check callback returning 1 (it returns 0 during the test run).

I can reproduce this by reading and modifying an uninitialized temporary storage value.

This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/4775#comment10429

Yexo wrote:

The problem is that the newgrf is checking some values from var 62. In testmode these have different values than in exec mode because in exec mode the tile is cleared before the callback is called.

This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/4775#comment10430

Yexo closed the ticket.

Reason for closing: Fixed

In r22994

This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/4775