Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

usage of load and save rcon commands is inconsistant #3761

Closed
DorpsGek opened this issue Apr 12, 2010 · 1 comment
Closed

usage of load and save rcon commands is inconsistant #3761

DorpsGek opened this issue Apr 12, 2010 · 1 comment
Labels
flyspray This issue is imported from FlySpray (https://bugs.openttd.org/)

Comments

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member

planetmaker opened the ticket and wrote:

The usage of load and save commands is inconsistant: one requires the filename extension, the other not:

!rcon save desync_debug
planetmaker: Saving map...
planetmaker: Map successfully saved to desync_debug.sav
!rcon load desync_debug.sav
(...)
Rubidium, one of the answers will be "so how to know which extension to choose, if there are savegames of different formats, but same name ;-)
or the other option: savegames without extension, if people forget :-P
I don't yet have an answer for that really
then it should say it's ambiguous

I prefer actually to skip the filename extension in the command and add the default .sav unless for a load command it's ambigeous.

Reported version: trunk
Operating system: All


This issue was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3761
@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

Rubidium closed the ticket.

Reason for closing: Fixed

In r19885


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3761

@DorpsGek DorpsGek added Core flyspray This issue is imported from FlySpray (https://bugs.openttd.org/) labels Apr 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
flyspray This issue is imported from FlySpray (https://bugs.openttd.org/)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant