Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't reuse the the small airport 'firestation' on the intercontinetal airport #3494

Closed
DorpsGek opened this issue Jan 7, 2010 · 7 comments
Labels
component: NewGRF This issue is related to NewGRFs flyspray This issue is imported from FlySpray (https://bugs.openttd.org/)

Comments

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member

DorpsGek commented Jan 7, 2010

2006TTD opened the ticket and wrote:

There is a sprite from the small airport appeared in an intercontinental airport. Using TTRS3 and Combined Airport Set in r18743. I placed the GRFs in different sequences and tried removing one of them but with no avail.

Attachments

Reported version: Version?
Operating system: All


This issue was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3494
@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

DorpsGek commented Jan 7, 2010

2006TTD wrote:

This even happens when using original graphics and without newGRFs too.


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3494#comment7282

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

DorpsGek commented Jan 7, 2010

Rubidium wrote:

It's been this way for many many years, i.e. since that airport was included.


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3494#comment7284

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

DorpsGek commented Jan 7, 2010

Yexo wrote:

It'd be easy to change to another existing tile, so if you can propose an existing airport tile (or other graphics that are not in a newgrf) we could change it. Personally I don't think any chance it's needed, you're the first to complain since the airport has been included.


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3494#comment7286

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

DorpsGek commented Jan 8, 2010

2006TTD wrote:

How about changing it with a bare tile (with runway fence)?


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3494#comment7296

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

DorpsGek commented Jan 9, 2010

athanasios wrote:

And it will look similar to SE runways bare tiles. ;-)


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3494#comment7311

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

Yexo closed the ticket.

Reason for closing: Won't implement

Can be done by a newgrf.


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3494

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

PaulC wrote:

I would like to second this request...

Sprites # 2267-8 (trg1r) are an incomplete section of building with poor transparency and also missing part of the water tower feet. IMO this doesn't look good or fit well with the rest of the airport, and would be better replaced with another tile (e.g. a plain grass tile, which would give the airport a bit of symmetry). Reuse of these sprites also means that an action 0 replacement of the small airport needs to factor in the intercontinental airport, an inconvenience which would be btter avoided.

I'm not sure how this could be resolved by a newgrf (action 0 airport tiles?) but that's not necessarily an ideal solution.

As an aside, is there any reason why the intercontinental airport has fences at the end of the runways (unlike all the other airports)?

Attachments


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3494#comment9891

@DorpsGek DorpsGek added flyspray This issue is imported from FlySpray (https://bugs.openttd.org/) component: NewGRF This issue is related to NewGRFs enhancement labels Apr 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component: NewGRF This issue is related to NewGRFs flyspray This issue is imported from FlySpray (https://bugs.openttd.org/)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant