Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

train ignores signal though not told to do so (pbs) #3039

Closed
DorpsGek opened this issue Jul 18, 2009 · 4 comments
Closed

train ignores signal though not told to do so (pbs) #3039

DorpsGek opened this issue Jul 18, 2009 · 4 comments
Labels
flyspray This issue is imported from FlySpray (https://bugs.openttd.org/)

Comments

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member

planetmaker opened the ticket and wrote:

Look at trains # 39, # 71, # 88 and # 89

Train # 88 is stopped and messed around with (I'll try to reproduce the exact steps and report back; it might have gotten an ignore signal command and a reverse train), # 39 will crash into it once # 71 clears the entrance. But # 89 wasn't touched and should wait safely at the signal till the accident clears and not join the pile of scrap metal.

Tested with r16867.

Attachments

Reported version: trunk
Operating system: All


This issue was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3039
@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

planetmaker wrote:

ok, I prepared a test game.

Tell train # 2 to ignore signals. Train # 3 will crash then also.

Attachments


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3039#comment6334

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

SmatZ wrote:

Thanks for report!

test_crash.sav is fixed in r16857 (at least for me)
autosave80.sav - there are many ways this could happen if you were playing with "ignore signals" button or doing some similiar nasty stuff... Is there any way to reproduce it without having two trains on the same tile (so one of them can't reserve the track)?


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3039#comment6335

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

planetmaker wrote:

nvm. This can be closed. I tested erronously with a wrong version (the hg hashes sometimes make it difficult to distinguish). It's fixed in r16857


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3039#comment6336

@DorpsGek
Copy link
Member Author

SmatZ closed the ticket.

Reason for closing: Fixed

r16857


This comment was imported from FlySpray: https://bugs.openttd.org/task/3039

@DorpsGek DorpsGek added flyspray This issue is imported from FlySpray (https://bugs.openttd.org/) bug labels Apr 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
flyspray This issue is imported from FlySpray (https://bugs.openttd.org/)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant